Conscious Autosuggestion
Emile Coué
SELF MASTERY THROUGH CONSCIOUS AUTOSUGGESTION
Suggestion, or rather Autosuggestion, is quite a new subject,
and yet at the same time it is as old as the world.
It is new in the sense that until now it has been wrongly
studied and in consequence wrongly understood; it is old because it
dates from the appearance of man on the earth. In fact
autosuggestion is an instrument that we possess at birth, and in
this instrument, or rather in this force, resides a marvelous and
incalculable power, which according to circumstances produces the
best or the worst results. Knowledge of this force is useful to
each one of us, but it is peculiarly indispensable to doctors,
magistrates, lawyers, and to those engaged in the work of
education.
By knowing how to practise it
consciously it is possible in the first
place to avoid provoking in others bad autosuggestions which may
have disastrous consequences, and secondly, consciously to provoke
good ones instead, thus bringing physical health to the sick, and
moral health to the neurotic and the erring, the unconscious
victims of anterior autosuggestions, and to guide into the right
path those who had a tendency to take the wrong
one.
THE CONSCIOUS SELF AND THE UNCONSCIOUS SELF
In order to understand properly the phenomena of suggestion,
or to speak more correctly of autosuggestion, it is necessary to
know that two absolutely distinct selves exist within us. Both are
intelligent, but while one is conscious the other is unconscious.
For this reason the existence of the latter generally escapes
notice. It is however easy to prove its existence if one merely
takes the trouble to examine certain phenomena and to reflect a few
moments upon them. Let us take for instance the following
examples:
Every one has heard of somnambulism; every one knows
that a somnambulist gets up at night without
waking , leaves his room after either dressing
himself or not, goes downstairs, walks along corridors, and after
having executed certain acts or accomplished certain work, returns
to his room, goes to bed again, and shows next day the greatest
astonishment at finding work finished which he had left unfinished
the day before.
It is however he himself who has done it without being aware
of it. What force has his body obeyed if it is not an unconscious
force, in fact his unconscious self?
Let us now examine the alas, too frequent case of a
drunkard attacked by delirium tremens
. As though seized with madness he picks up the nearest
weapon, knife, hammer, or hatchet, as the case may be, and strikes
furiously those who are unlucky enough to be in his vicinity. Once
the attack is over, he recovers his senses and contemplates with
horror the scene of carnage around him, without realizing that he
himself is the author of it. Here again is it not the unconscious
self which has caused the unhappy man to act in this way?
[*]
[*] And what aversions, what ills we create for ourselves,
everyone of us and in every domain by not "immediately" bringing
into play "good conscious autosuggestions" against our "bad
unconscious autosuggestions," thus bringing about the disappearance
of all unjust suffering.
If we compare the conscious with the unconscious self we see
that the conscious self is often possessed of a very unreliable
memory while the unconscious self on the contrary is provided with
a marvelous and impeccable memory which registers without our
knowledge the smallest events, the least important acts of our
existence. Further, it is credulous and accepts with unreasoning
docility what it is told. Thus, as it is the unconscious that is
responsible for the functioning of all our organs but the
intermediary of the brain, a result is produced which may seem
rather paradoxical to you: that is, if it believes that a certain
organ functions well or ill or that we feel such and such an
impression, the organ in question does indeed function well or ill,
or we do feel that impression.
Not only does the unconscious self preside over the
functions of our organism, but also over all our
actions whatever they are . It is this that we
call imagination, and it is this which, contrary to accepted
opinion, always makes us act
even, and above all ,
against our will when there is
antagonism between these two forces.
WILL AND IMAGINATION
If we open a dictionary and look up the word "will", we
find this definition: "The faculty of freely determining certain
acts". We accept this definition as true and unattackable, although
nothing could be more false. This will that we claim so proudly,
always yields to the
imagination. It is an absolute
rule that admits of no exception
.
"Blasphemy! Paradox!" you will exclaim. "Not at all! On the
contrary, it is the purest truth," I shall reply.
In order to convince yourself of it, open your eyes,
look round you and try to understand what you see. You will then
come to the conclusion that what I tell you is not an idle theory,
offspring of a sick brain but the simple expression of a
fact .
Suppose that we place on the ground a plank 30 feet
long by 1 foot wide. It is evident that everybody will be capable
of going from one end to the other of this plank without stepping
over the edge. But now change the conditions of the experiment, and
imagine this plank placed at the height of the towers of a
cathedral. Who then will be capable of advancing even a few feet
along this narrow path? Could you hear me speak? Probably not.
Before you had taken two steps you would begin to tremble,
and in spite of every effort of your
will you would be certain to fall to the
ground.
Why is it then that you would not fall if the plank is
on the ground, and why should you fall if it is raised to a height
above the ground? Simply because in the first case you imagine that
it is easy to go to the end of this plank, while in the second case
you imagine that you
cannot do so.
Notice that your will is powerless to make you advance;
if you imagine that you
cannot , it is
absolutely impossible for you to do so.
If tilers and carpenters are able to accomplish this feat, it is
because they think they can do it.
Vertigo is entirely caused by the picture we make in
our minds that we are going to fall. This picture transforms itself
immediately into fact in spite of all the efforts
of our will , and the more violent these efforts
are, the quicker is the opposite to the desired result brought
about.
Let us now consider the case of a person suffering from
insomnia. If he does not make any effort to sleep, he will lie
quietly in bed. If on the contrary he tries to force himself to
sleep by his will , the more
efforts he makes, the more restless he becomes.
Have you not noticed that the more you try to remember the
name of a person which you have forgotten, the more it eludes you,
until, substituting in your mind the idea "I shall remember in a
minute" to the idea "I have forgotten", the name comes back to you
of its own accord without the least effort?
Let those of you who are cyclists remember the days when you
were learning to ride. You went along clutching the handle bars and
frightened of falling. Suddenly catching sight of the smallest
obstacle in the road you tried to avoid it, and the more efforts
you made to do so, the more surely you rushed upon it.
Who has not suffered from an attack of uncontrollable
laughter, which bursts out more violently the more one tries to
control it?
What was the state of mind of each person in these
different circumstances? " I do not
want to fall but I cannot
help doing so"; "I
want to sleep but I
cannot "; "I
want to remember the name of Mrs. So
and So, but I cannot ";
"I want to avoid the obstacle,
but I cannot "; "I
want to stop laughing, but I
cannot ."
As you see, in each of these conflicts it is always
the imagination which gains the
victory over the will , without
any exception.
To the same order of ideas belongs the case of the
leader who rushes forward at the head of his troops and always
carries them along with him, while the cry "Each man for himself!"
is almost certain to cause a defeat. Why is this? It is because in
the first case the men imagine
that they must go forward
, and in the second they imagine
that they are conquered and must fly for their
lives.
Panurge was quite aware of the contagion of example, that is
to say the action of the imagination, when, to avenge himself upon
a merchant on board the same boat, he bought his biggest sheep and
threw it into the sea, certain beforehand that the entire flock
would follow, which indeed happened.
We human beings have a certain resemblance to sheep,
and involuntarily, we are irresistibly impelled to follow other
people's examples, imagining
that we cannot do otherwise.
I could quote a thousand other examples but I should
fear to bore you by such an enumeration. I cannot however pass by
in silence this fact which shows the enormous power of the
imagination, or in other words of the unconscious in its struggle
against the will
.
There are certain drunkards who wish to give up
drinking, but who cannot do so. Ask them, and they will reply in
all sincerity that they desire to be sober, that drink disgusts
them, but that they are irresistibly impelled to drink against
their will , in spite of the
harm they know it will do them.
In the same way certain criminals commit crimes
in spite of themselves , and when they
are asked why they acted so, they answer "I could not help it,
something impelled me, it was stronger than I."
And the drunkard and the criminal speak the truth; they are
forced to do what they do, for the simple reason they imagine they
cannot prevent themselves from doing so. Thus we who are so proud
of our will, who believe that we are free to act as we like, are in
reality nothing but wretched puppets of which our imagination holds
all the strings. We only cease to be puppets when we have learned
to guide our imagination.
SUGGESTION AND AUTOSUGGESTION
According to the preceding remarks we can compare the
imagination to a torrent which fatally sweeps away the poor wretch
who has fallen into it, in spite of his efforts to gain the bank.
This torrent seems indomitable; but if you know how, you can turn
it from its course and conduct it to the factory, and there you can
transform its force into movement, heat, and
electricity.
If this simile is not enough, we may compare the
imagination--"the madman at home" as it has been called--to an
unbroken horse which has neither bridle nor reins. What can the
rider do except let himself go wherever the horse wishes to take
him? And often if the latter runs away, his mad career only comes
to end in the ditch. If however the rider succeeds in putting a
bridle on the horse, the parts are reversed. It is no longer the
horse who goes where he likes, it is the rider who obliges the
horse to take him wherever he wishes to go.
Now that we have learned to realize the enormous power
of the unconscious or imaginative being, I am going to show how
this self, hitherto considered indomitable, can be as easily
controlled as a torrent or an unbroken horse. But before going any
further it is necessary to define carefully two words that are
often used without being properly understood. These are the
words suggestion and
autosuggestion .
What then is suggestion? It may be defined as "the act
of imposing an idea on the brain of another". Does this action
really exist? Properly speaking, no. Suggestion does not indeed
exist by itself. It does not and cannot exist except on the
sine qua non condition of transforming
itself into autosuggestion in
the subject. This latter word may be defined as "the implanting of
an idea in oneself by oneself."
You may make a suggestion to someone; if the
unconscious of the latter does not accept the suggestion, if it has
not, as it were, digested it, in order to transform it into
autosuggestion , it produces no result.
I have myself occasionally made a more or less commonplace
suggestion to ordinarily very obedient subjects quite
unsuccessfully. The reason is that the unconscious of the subject
refused to accept it and did not transform it into
autosuggestion .
THE USE OF AUTOSUGGESTION